翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Gershon Review ・ Gershon Rorich ・ Gershon Shafat ・ Gershon Shaked ・ Gershon Shofman ・ Gershon Sirota ・ Gershon Winkler ・ Gershon Yankelewitz ・ Gershon Zak ・ Gershonite ・ Gershwin (disambiguation) ・ Gershwin A. Drain ・ Gershwin Live! ・ Gershwin Piano Concerto ・ Gershwin Prize ・ Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. ・ Gershwin Theatre ・ Gershwin's World ・ Gersik Saguking ・ Gersloot ・ Gerso Fernandes ・ Gerson ・ Gerson Acevedo ・ Gerson ben Solomon Catalan ・ Gerson D. Cohen ・ Gerson da Cunha ・ Gerson dos Santos ・ Gerson Echeverry ・ Gerson García ・ Gerson Goldhaber Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. ''Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc.'' 443 F.2d 1159 (2d Cir. 1971), was a copyright infringement case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second District ruled that defendant Columbia Artists Management, Inc. was liable for vicarious copyright infringement and contributory copyright infringement. Plaintiff American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers ("ASCAP"), on behalf of Gershwin Publishing Corp., sued Columbia Artists Management, Inc. ("CAMI") on the premise that CAMI had not gotten permission to use a song from its repertory for a public, for-profit concert in which artists managed by CAMI performed. The final court decision established that contributory infringement can still be liable for copyright infringement if the party has knowledge of the violating activity, whether or not they are directly involved in the violation.〔 ==Background== In January 9, 1956, Todd Duncan and Camilla Williams, artists managed by CAMI, performed "Bess, You Is My Woman Now" at a public, for-profit concert in Port Washington, New York.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/443/1159/246236/ )〕 The concert was sponsored by the Port Washington Community Concert Association. The song was performed without the artist nor the local association getting permission from Gershwin Publishing Corporation, who owned the copyright to the song. Subsequently, ASCAP sued CAMI for allowing not paying license fees while gaining financial profit from the performance. ASCAP used this scenario as a test case to determine whether CAMI could continue to avoid paying license fees when music from ASCAP's catalogue is played at local community concerts. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.